← Back to library
Customer story · Accounting

How Ignite Spot Saved Over $20,000 a Year by Consolidating Its Billing Stack

Dan Luthi runs operations at Ignite Spot, an accounting and advisory firm built on recurring client engagements. For a firm that bills the same clients month after month, the cost and reliability of the billing cycle land straight on the bottom line. Before Anchor, that cycle ran across three separate platforms and cost Ignite Spot more than $20,000 a year in fees, subscriptions, and staff time to keep it running. Consolidating the stack into one system took that cost out and made the firm more profitable, without changing a single client relationship.

"The usability not only for the firm and the client makes working in Anchor a no-brainer for our firm and others.”
Dan Luthi, Partner, Ignite Spot
~$1.3K/MonthSaved on payment processing
10+ hrs/MonthSaved on billing admin
Dan Luthi, Partner, Ignite Spot
The Challenge

Before Anchor, getting paid at Ignite Spot meant running three disconnected platforms and paying for all of them. Proposals were built and sent in PandaDoc, with client contact details copied over by hand from HubSpot and heavy customization on every one. As Dan put it, the team would spend, honestly, hours tailoring each proposal. Once a client signed, payment authorization was collected separately, through PandaDoc or DocuSign depending on the situation. Payments themselves ran through QuickBooks, and later Bill.com, each requiring recurring transactions to be set up by hand.

That fragmentation carried a direct and recurring cost. PandaDoc licenses ran about $5,000 a year for the firm's users. DocuSign added another $500 to $600 a year. And payment processing on QuickBooks cost roughly $2,200 to $2,300 a month in merchant fees. The firm was paying three vendors to do one job.

The stack was also unreliable in a way that quietly cost money. Because nothing was connected, the team ran a full verification pass every single month to confirm charges had actually gone through. Every month it surfaced problems.

"We always had a huge reconciliation process. Candidly, we would probably find one to two every single month that didn't follow. Whether it was a client that disengaged, a proposal change - there was always something we missed.”
Dan Luthi, Partner, Ignite Spot

Each miss meant a refund to process or a client to chase, on top of the hours already spent hunting for it. Proposal changes made it worse. A change did not just update a record. It triggered a fresh hunt for which tool held the agreement, and then a new payment authorization from the client before the firm could collect the revised amount. For an operations lead, that was the core frustration: the firm could not reliably bill what it had agreed to, and it could not be sure the money would arrive.

The setup also boxed in the firm's clients. Managing card fees across the old tools was cumbersome enough that Ignite Spot never offered card payment at all. Clients could pay by ACH or not at all, with no say in how they paid.

The Solution

Why Anchor

Dan first heard about Anchor almost by accident. A marketing firm reached out to ask him, as an accountant, what he needed from a billing solution, walked him through how firms in his position were solving it, and mentioned Anchor at the end. He had never heard of the platform. A few weeks later Anchor followed up directly, and a conversation around a conference turned into a full product walkthrough.

What made the decision straightforward was seeing the whole billing cycle in one place. Anchor starts at the agreement, not the invoice: a client signs a proposal, a payment method is captured in the same step, and invoicing, collection, and reconciliation run from that signed agreement automatically. For a firm paying three vendors to stitch that cycle together by hand, the contrast was obvious. One system would replace PandaDoc, DocuSign, and the Bill.com and QuickBooks payment setup, and it would do the reconciliation the team had been doing manually every month.

The tie-off point was that even the people most likely to resist could not argue with it. Dan does not control the tools his sales team uses, so new software usually meant a back-and-forth. This time there was none.

"The time savings alone was going to be such a massive win for us that there was actually no way that the sales team could be like, no, this doesn't make sense.”
Dan Luthi, Partner, Ignite Spot

Anchor also solved a problem the old stack never could. Because payment collection is built into the agreement rather than bolted on afterward, Ignite Spot could finally offer clients a choice of how to pay, including cards, for the first time. Instead of the firm managing that complexity, the client picks the method that suits them at signing.

Implementation

The move onto Anchor was fast, and it started at the top of the funnel. Anchor's HubSpot integration let the team push contact details straight into a new proposal instead of retyping them, removing the copy-paste step that had opened every client engagement. From first contact, Ignite Spot could turn around a proposal in 30 to 40 minutes, with payment collection configured as part of the same flow rather than chased down afterward.

Consolidation followed directly. Because the signed agreement now drove invoicing and collection on its own, Ignite Spot retired all three of the tools it had been paying for: PandaDoc, DocuSign, and the Bill.com payment setup. Proposals, agreements, payment authorization, and reconciliation moved into one platform.

The switch also let the firm turn on client payment choice for the first time. Card payment became an option alongside ACH, and clients select their preferred method at signing. Because collection is pre-authorized in the agreement, clients now get automated notifications when a card is about to expire, so a lapsed payment method gets fixed before it becomes a failed charge.

The Results

Consolidating three tools into Anchor took real cost off Ignite Spot's books, and the biggest piece was the cost of getting paid. On QuickBooks, payment processing ran the firm roughly $2,200 to $2,300 a month in merchant fees. On Anchor, that dropped to about $900 a month. At those rates the firm is saving on the order of $1,300 to $1,400 every month, or roughly $15,600 to $16,800 a year, on payment processing alone.

On top of that, the firm stopped paying for the tools Anchor replaced. PandaDoc licensing had cost about $5,000 a year, and DocuSign another $500 to $600. Together with the processing savings, consolidating the stack removed somewhere around $21,100 to $22,400 a year in hard cost, money that now stays in the firm rather than going out to three vendors. For an accounting and advisory firm, that flows straight to margin.

The reclaimed time carried its own value. Two people had spent five to six hours each per month on the manual verification and the back-and-forth it created, one on the admin side, one at partner level. Valued at Dan's own rates, roughly $25 to $30 an hour for admin work and $75 to $100 for partner time, that recovered labor is worth about $6,000 to $9,400 a year.

"That conversation doesn't exist anymore. The confidence in being able to know it's already taken care of has been able to save us two, three, four hours a month per person of conversation back and forth.”
Dan Luthi, Partner, Ignite Spot

That confidence came from the reliability the old stack never had. The monthly verification pass is gone, and the one to two billing misses the team used to catch every month, disengaged clients still being billed, proposal changes that never reached the invoice, charges that quietly failed to run, have stopped surfacing. Each of those had meant a refund to process or a client to chase. Now the billing runs from the signed agreement without a manual check to confirm it worked.

Client payment friction eased as well. With card payment available for the first time and clients choosing their own method at signing, the firm removed a limitation it had lived with for years. Automated expiration notices catch a lapsing card before it turns into a failed collection, closing off a problem that used to require follow-up.

For Ignite Spot, the switch to Anchor was not about adding a feature. It was about removing cost and uncertainty from a process the firm had been overpaying to run. Three vendors became one. More than $20,000 a year in fees and subscriptions came off the books. The monthly scramble to verify that clients had actually been billed correctly disappeared, and with it the refunds and chasing that used to follow.

What is left is a billing cycle that runs from the signed agreement on its own, at a fraction of the cost, while giving clients more control over how they pay than the firm could ever offer before. For an operations lead, that combination of lower cost, higher reliability, and less friction is what made the case easy to make internally and easy to stand behind since.

Build your own case

See what a consolidated billing system could do for your firm.

We’ll walk you through what an Anchor  shaped transformation looks like for your practice.